Thursday, September 1 2022 17:39

ArmInfo. The formation of a commission to prepare a peace treaty jeopardizes the status of Artsakh, especially, against the background of the readiness of the  Armenian leadership to make any concessions to Azerbaijan. Political  strategist Vigen Hakobyan expressed a similar opinion to ArmInfo.

Following a 4-hour meeting in Brussels, the leaders of Armenia,  Azerbaijan and the head of the European Council reached an agreement  to continue substantive negotiations at the level of foreign  ministers for a month around the development of a draft peace treaty.   Nikol Pashinyan, Charles Michel and Ilham Aliyev discussed issues  related to the return of prisoners of war, the fate of missing  persons, border demarcation and border security, regional deblockade,  as well as the settlement of relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia  and the Karabakh problem.

As a result of the talks, an agreement was also reached to hold a  meeting of the Commission on Delimitation and Border Security in  November in Brussels. The next leader level meeting will also take  place in November.  "It is known that on August 31 in Brussels, among  other issues, the Artsakh agenda was discussed, including the issue  of the status of Artsakh. With all the ensuing consequences and  prospects. In this case, I consider it appropriate to recall Aliyev's  regularly expressed position, according to which there is no "problem  of the status of Artsakh, just as there is no problem of Artsakh  itself", which is also regularly met with Yerevan's silence, which in  its turn shows the latters readiness to accept Baku's position," he  said.

Moreover, according to the political strategist, Nikol Pashinyan, who  is turning Armenia into a tool serving the interests of external  power centers, moreover, not to the interests of one center, but to  several centers at the same time, is exacerbating the situation even  more. According to him, Pashinyan's Armenia is ruled not only by  Russia, but also by Turkey, Iran, the United States, Great Britain  and even Azerbaijan.

"We are talking about the management of the security unit, the  management of financial flows. This reduces Armenia's ability to  influence its own destiny to a historical minimum. It is not we who  make all the major decisions, but they are made for us. This inspires  serious concern for the future of our country.  Especially against  the background of the presence of a number of similar examples in the  modern world and in the system of international relations," the  political strategist summed up.