Newsfeed

ArmenTel's subscribers to shortly enjoy IP television

Vahe Hakobyan: Investments must create jobs

Politician: "Republican Party of Armenia deporting Armenians from their motherland"

In corporate strategy for 2014 Araratbank gives special priority to activities of businesswomen

Rostelecom provides a number of educational establishments in Abovyan with free superhigh- speed Internet services starting from March 1

Areximbank-Gazprombank Group to provide customers with free non-chip MasterCards under a campaign for motorists

MasterCard holders among VTB Group's Armenian customers can withdraw cash from VTB Group's ATM network at the same tariffs as at VTB Bank (Armenia)

Orange offers an innovative solution for internet and fixed phone services

Lyova Khachatryan: Prosperous Armenia Party will not demand resignation of Armenian President

Political expert rules out an external factor in Tigran Sargsyan's resignation

Edward Nalbandian and Seyran Ohanyan reappointed

Armenian political expert skeptical about viability of "the union of the four"

Moscow: Fulfillment of "road map" will allow Armenia to join Customs Union and Eurasian Economic Union

Gagik Makaryan: Appointment of Hovik Abrahamyan as Prime Minister is intended to ease political and social tension in Armenia rather than deepen reforms

Tatul Manaseryan: Hovik Abrahamyan is able to find a common language even with the opposition

Naira Zohrabyan: The new premier of Armenia should not continue the programme of his predecessor

Deputy Head of Heritage Party: Appointment of Hovik Abrahamyan as prime minister aims to tie Prosperous Armenia Party's hand and foot

Member of the parliament: Hovik Abrahamyan is a compromising man at the position of Armenia's prime minister

Boris Navasardyan: Appointment of Hovik Abrahamyan as prime minister meets oligarchs' aspirations

Hovik Abrahamyan starts forming the new Cabinet

Stepan Safaryan: Conflict of business-interests of Tsarukyan and Kocharyan is not ruled out in the near future

Moscow: One should draw no parallels between Crimea and Nagorno-Karabakh

Tigran Urikhanyan: Prosperous Armenia Party does not consider joining ruling coalition

Serzh Sargsyan: State budget is inviolable and bribery is forbidden

Sources: Along with prime minister’s post, RPA determined to make some other staff reshuffles – Sharmazanov taking parliament speaker’s position, Haroutiunyan going back to the justice ministry, while Sargsyan to engage in diplomacy

Ruling Party entrusts Hovik Abrahamyan with power of prime minister

Yerevan Brandy Company is number one brandy producer in Armenia and number one exporter, Henri Reynaud says

Sargsyan-Abrahamyan-Tsarukyan meeting underway at Armenian President's palace

Activist of "I'm Against" initiative calls on citizens to make no utility payments until the mechanism automatically transferring pension interest to funds is cancelled

"I'm Against" civic initiative intends to apply to court against State Revenue Committee

Ivan Volynkin: Annual Conference of Russian Compatriots makes an invaluable contribution to development of relations between Armenia and Russia

Regional

Vice-Speaker of Israeli Knesset to Deliver in Tbilisi Lecture on Israeli-Arabic Relations

German Chancellor Invites Garibashvili to Visit her Country

Georgian Foreign Minister to Visit Germany

Georgian Foreign Minister Attends International Conference in Vilnius

President to Have Exclusive Right to Grant Georgian Citizenship

NATO Week in Georgia Starts Today

Discussion of the Azerbaijani-Iranian relations on Culture and Tourism

Chief of General Staff of the RF to visit Baku

Ilham Aliyev will visit NAR

Georgian Premier Starts his Regional Tour

Georgian President to Hold Talks in Poland

Georgian Prime Minister Meets with EU Special Adviser

Erdogan is arriving in Baku

Simplification of the visa regime between the EU and Azerbaijan may occur in the summer

U.S. Embassy: Any allegations that US government representatives are trying to foment a revolution in Azerbaijan are absolutely absurd

Foreign Minister of Afghanistan to Pay Official Visit to Georgia

Georgian Foreign Ministry Makes Strict Statement, Concerning Referendum in the Crimea

President Margvelashvili Meets Georgian Troops, Deployed in Afghanistan

Georgian Premier and Afghan Foreign Minister Discuss Two Countries' Relations

Georgian Premier Holds Official Dinner in Honor of Romanian Prime Minister

Analyst: The USA invested $5 billion to directly support Maidan

Georgian Ambassador to Japan Hands over Credentials to His Imperial Majesty Emperor Akihito of Japan.

Tbilisi Hosts Annual PDP Conference

NATO May Accelerate Georgia's Integration and Grant it MAP because of the Crimea Problem

Georgian Ambassador to Lithuania Addresses Seimas

Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister in Baku

Gerhard Schroeder will make a speech in Baku

Putin is unable to persuade the leader of the Crimean Tatars

Georgian Defence Minister Attends NATO Defence Ministerial

Saakashvili is Offered High Post in Kiev

Exclusive

Vahe Hakobyan: Investments must create jobs

Sergey Markedonov: People living in Crimea and Karabakh saw no future for the countries they were attached to

Vahram Avanesyan: It is impossible to achieve serious results by means of standard and framework reforms

Wayne Merry: Situation around Ukraine is a serious alarm that the South Caucasus political nucleus must be seriously revised

Dariusz Prasek: EBRD demands absolute transparency from companies

Sargis Hatspanyan: When it comes to the change of regime in Armenia, the West washes hands of it

Andrey Yepivantsev: Only time may show if we have opened Pandora's box in the Crimea or not

Giorgi Tarkhan-Mouravi: Confrontation around the Crimea will speed up Ukraine's European integration

Ivan Kukhta: Ukraine has received a chance to be totally reset

Vaidotas Verba: Eastern Partnership project is not directed against anybody, it is simply for open opportunities

Vladimir Yevseev: The only way out of the situation in Ukraine for the West is through negotiations with Russia

Edward Sharmazanov: The principle of peoples’ right to self-determination tends to dominate in the world

Gevorg Poghosyan: Armenia is on an explosive-timing device and may explode at any moment

Sergey Grinyayev: Armenia has just to realize its status of an essential partner for Russia

Grigory Tishchenko: Strengthening of Russia’s positions in the South Caucasus will contribute to peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

Artak Shakaryan: Armenia and Diaspora should be ready for Turkey’s imitative policy in the matter of Armenian Genocide recognition

Hovhannes Igityan: Only reason why they 'invited' Armenia into the Customs Union was to show Europe who wears the pants in the post-Soviet area

Alexander Voronin: ANELIK has almost 20% of all money transfers in the CIS

Tatul Manaseryan: We are on the right way but somehow stuck in the jam…

Interview of Tatul Manaseryan, professor, well-known Armenian economist, the promoter of Alternative Research Center with ArmInfo News Agency

  • by Emmanuil Mkrtchyan and Elita Babayan

  • Monday, February 13, 07:16

 “Transfer economy will be fading away and this is inevitable.” Tatul Manaseryan, professor, well-known Armenian economist, the promoter of Alternative Research Center, makes such unpromising forecasts in an interview with ArmInfo. The expert urges construction of self-sufficient economy and not autocratic trends. He is for the competitive market model that will not lead to deformations. On the way to such economy, the expert recommends defining the conceptual framework before setting long-term and ambitious goals.

Last year the envisaged economic growth totaled 6.1%.  A question arises: do we create a new value having such an economic growth? No, probably, given our high inflation, the recovering transfer economy and growing prices in the mining industry. All these factors almost by half “eat away” the real GDP growth, though we are told quite the opposite. There is certain paradigmatic absurdity of figures. What do you think about it?

The 6.1% economic growth is of recovery nature, but economy is recovering very slowly, especially after the slump in 2009. As for the basis of this growth, it is mining industry. This is what Armenia is “boast of”.  In Armenia we call in processing industry. You’d probably ask if one can call processing the recovery of minerals, clean a little and export. Today we call processing even just recovery of mineral without any processing. But, let’s not dwell on this issue and just call it partial processing industry.

Now, let’s speak of the agricultural sector. Last year’s growth in this sector was good enough, but the sector greatly depends on weather conditions and rural residents have no guarantees or confidence in the future. It is a psychological factor that has rather a serious economic effect. There was certain activation also in the IT-sector, tourist industry, which is specific and cannot be compared with the achievements of any other post-Soviet countries. Even in Iran there is a free tourist zone – Kish.

Turning to the GDP structure, I’d like to say that it has not been formed at all. Moreover, we have no idea of the structure the domestic product should have. Therefore, we do not think of what GDP growth is based on. The growth is episodic and depends on several factors. We have not decided about the locomotive sectors yet. Neither we know what are the criteria for determining competitive advantages.

The conference of the ruling party touched upon the sectors of diamond cutting, pharmaceutics, brandy production and precision engineering…

It is very good that the government is setting priorities, though I am a little skeptical about engineering, a sector that was once our pride. As for pharmaceutics, we successfully combined the traditions of pharmaceutical science and practice, and managed to continue them with a help of the private sector, unlike engineering industry that we have been “killing” within 20 years.

There were certain efforts to revive machine-tool plants, but they failed not for lack of financing or brains, but for lack of such specialists as millers. We did not estimate our potential in the given sphere and didn’t throw out a feeler.  Therefore, before setting any priorities, we should reveal the competitive advantages. We will have no progress until this fundamental problems is settled. This is what hinders our development.

Second, very few know about our economy’s raw materials potential. We do not know out potential either. In the meantime, determination of the quantity and quality of the national values, such as natural resources, is an issue of strategic importance for every country. By the way, in the Soviet Union they regularly estimated natural resources.  This is an uneasy task for us now, because very few relevant specialists are left in the country.

Turning to the resources, I’d like to say that in conditions of development of the science-intensive economy, it is not sufficient to have relevant knowledge. It is necessary to efficiently use that knowledge.  The key factor of such new economy should be human development and human resources improvement. It requires, first of all, exact information on the specialists in the country. For instance, we have announced the IT-sector a priority, but we have no exact data on the number of IT-specialists in the country and their skills. There are many such examples.  How many lawyers and economists do we have? I do not speak of their skills so far. How many unemployed do we create every year, and part of them is “ordered” by the state. Needless to say how many good specialists we “gift” to our countries.

Economic diversification is much spoken of today. It should hold us from lagging behind even in case of unfavorable foreign market environment and falling into crisis extremities like in 2009. What do the economic and political authorities think about that?

Here we have lack in two aspects. First, today the government really wants positive changes, which is very important. If the country was once considered industrially developed, though it was in different conditions and format, we believe that it achievable today as well, especially that there is relevant potential for that. The second aspect is that the government has finally begun to speak of the national model of economic development, something I was speaking about many years ago.  No matter that the given initiative has got negative response by some international structures. 

There is another positive decision of the government that implies financial assistance to the students studying in abroad. The program is not so effective so far, but it will be quite fruitful in future.

But, we have no system to reveal and select talented human resources, which cannot but affect the social-economic and political development of the country…

Well, there are many talented people who are “left out in the cold”. This problem needs a comprehensive solution.

Fundamental decisions are probably necessary also for development of SMEs. Much is still to de done here…

We lack conceptual framework also in the given sector. What do we understand saying small and medium-sized enterprises? Unfortunately, most people think that SME is, first of all, trade. In this light, Russia’s experience in creation of own “Silicon Valley”, a system supporting the science-intensive small and medium-sized enterprises, is very relevant.

That is, to create some not big projects and raised funds for their implementation…

Precisely, and it is not possible without the state support. As for the native economy, I reiterate that we must determine the conceptual framework and reveal our advantages and set priorities, believe in their realization and be consistent in our undertakings. It is possible in the country with such a small and compact economy in a rather short period of time.

What about the monopolies? It seems that the given problem will never get solution. In such situation, no tangible changes are possible in the given economy sector. Don’t you think so?

We have two serious problems with monopolies.  The first problem is the oligopolies killing SMEs. The second problem is the capital outflow. The point is that monopolies began to “gasp” in our small market and gradually outflow from the country in terms of the capital, indeed.

What are the annual volumes of the capital outflow?

I think, capital outflow is a much more serious threat to the economy, than the problem of SME. As for the capital that has already flown out, there are certain difficulties with its calculation. We have no data where to and for what purposes the capital flows out of the country.  Our compatriots invested a part of this capital in the real estate in abroad, but they suffered big losses because of the crisis. In the meanwhile, that capital could be invested inside the country and in implementation of various projects in the sphere of industrial production and agriculture as well as of joint projects with Russia, for instance.

In what circumstances may the problem of monopolies get a solution?

It is known that when two businessmen meet even to have a cup of coffee, the first thing they speak about is to unite their businesses and create a monopoly. It is obvious that the private sector cannot fight monopolies i.e. to curb its appetite.  It is rather a political task that has its legislative and economic solutions. There is a law on protection of economic competition, and there is a commission for protection economic competition, which we used to call an anti-monopoly commission. But, these are two different conceptions. Protection of economic competition does not imply fighting monopolies. The given law needs exacts and tough measures of punishment and relevant political will.

The second task is lack of human resources in the given structure. The commission lacks specialists to study all the sectors of economy and launch an efficient fight against monopolies. Monopolies do not emerge independently, but in such a small economy they are formed quite naturally. If we fail to settle that problem, we will never build a healthy economy with competitive market.

 

Turning to the outflow of capital, are there any approximate data on the volume of the capital outflow for the last few years? In Russia they calculate this index and publish it at the highest level, while in Armenia everyone is silent as if nothing happens in the country.

We can arm with three methods to calculate this indicator, but we will get only approximate figures. The first method is calculation on the basis of the payment balance, and the second is calculation on the basis of the existing resources, and third on the basis of the shadow economy. 

By the way, you have voiced the real volumes of shadow economy for many times…

Yet a few years ago I reported a 75% shadow economy, but the authorities have never accepted it. Now, even officials speak of this percentage. Now, shadow economy has exceeded even this extremely high bar. Why? The taxable economy is growing with the shadow growing trice as much.

The outflow of capital is close to the volume of transfers i.e. some 1 billion USD. Transfer is another serious problem of our economy. It is a phenomenon that allows keeping consumer demand high. We must no longer rely on the resources of the Diaspora Armenians. Their mentality is changing. In the new world everybody cares for himself.

Do you mean that the transfer economy will fade away?

Yes, I do. It is inevitable. The social market economy that I suggest, the economy of future Armenia may gather pace in succession of time. This process will start when economic science and ideas are claimed.  I am confident, we will see the fruits of those times during our life.  

Thanks

Send to a friend

To (e-mail)


Your name


Message


Comments

View comments (0)
  • READ ALL COMMENTS
  • POST A COMMENT

Be first to comment on this article

* Indicates required fields